Admirable Evasions:
How Psychology Undermines Morality
Theodore Dalrymple
Encounter Books,
New York 2015
ISBN 9781594037870
Why I’m reading it:
I’m
reading because I’ve gotten through Dalrymple’s Life at the Bottom, and along
the way I decided that this guy is a clear thinker and writes really well.
What I think of it:
Dalrymple’s thesis can be expressed
very simply as: ‘ignore the experts and take responsibility for your own behavior,
if you want to be free from what’s making you miserable’. Hard words, but
important.
I
feel the impulse to justify myself like anyone does, and it can be hard to hold
to an ideal like being responsible, when so many people don’t. It is the narrow
way that leads to life. Dalrymple has not written a religious defense of
morality, rather he assumes morality exists as a starting point, and goes on to
explain how psychology has tried to evade, deride, and ignore that reality in
pursuit of Love of the Self.
Will I finish it?
Yes, it’s not a long book, and
Dalrymple’s writing style makes for fast reading.
Would I recommend
it?
Absolutely, for the thesis given above
alone. It also bears recommending for Dalrymple’s dissection of multiple psychological
tropes that have been used to justify immoral and self-destructive behavior.
Gimme a quote:
“The notion of self-love or self-esteem
is in itself either ridiculous or repellent. No one ascribes his good character
or successes in life to an adequate fund of self-esteem. No one says of any
human achievement that it was the fruit of self-esteem. Indeed, a dose of self-doubt
is, if anything, more likely than self-esteem to lead to the effort necessary
(but not sufficient) for such achievement.” Page 56,
paragraph 2.
“But as habits
become character, so the habit of superficiality eventually becomes . . .
deeply ingrained. Perhaps this explains the increasing need of extravagant
expression and gestures that seem to accompany thinness of content. Only thus
can one obtain notice in the torrent, the ocean of verbiage, though such extravagance
of expression and gesture is ultimately futile, since it leads to a competition
for attention that no one can win.” Page 70,
paragraph 1.
I have discussed this problem before
on this blog. Perhaps I was on to something after all.
No comments:
Post a Comment